News AEST

 

ECOSOCIAL TECHNOLOGY OF PREVENTION LETHATAL WARS

 

ITO Hironori

Ph.D

Professor

Academician of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies

Head of the Japan Branch of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies

Head of the Representative Office of the Institute for International Security and Informal Justice in Japan

 

 

The ecosocial technology of preventing lethal wars consists of launching into discursive-evaluative practice the universal enemies of humanity (sociopaths, social parasites), who, in order to maintain their tyranny, antinravstvennorality and irresponsibility, to retain the captured power and wealth, incite local and global lethal wars, push people, nations and states into bloody massacres under various kinds of provocative slogans.

Any lethal war can be just if it is aimed at protecting society and the state from internal and external social parasites, sociopaths. A state that has taken a nravstvennoral position inevitably becomes an object of attacks by external and internal enemies (sociopaths, social parasites). A society that has embarked on the nravstvennoral path of its development will inevitably be subjected to vicious attacks by external and internal universal enemies, who will make every effort to nravstvennorally decompose such a society. Otherwise, they will not survive. They need an antinravstvennoral atmosphere, global bloodbaths, to keep all the countries of the world and their inhabitants under control.

The presented ecosocial technology can be used by all nations of the world, social activists and government officials who have taken a nravstvennoral position and intend to put an end to lethal wars forever. Ecosocial technology allows solving this problem. Due to group expert and mass identification, as well as ethical assessment of specific warmongers, the neutralization of the activities of the enemies of humanity - sociopaths, social parasites - that are harmful to the world community is carried out.

Ecosocial technology was developed by institutes and departments of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies, based on the provisions of the USSR military scientific school of V.A. Chigirev and P.I. Yunatskevich.

 

1. Nravstvennoral principle and nravstvennost

 

1.1. Nravstvennoral principle – do no harm to yourself, others, or the environment. It is realized in the nravstvennoral rule “Three Cs” (III-C): do no harm to yourself, your neighbors, or the environment, either by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and the environment by thought, word, and deed.

1.2. Nravstvennost is a general expression of those properties of human nature that perform the function of regulating relations between members of society, regardless of social, national, religious and other factors. It is a special attitude of thinking and behavior that allows one not to harm oneself, others, and the environment.

1.3. Harm is a disturbance of human life that is felt and experienced by a person. Threat is a potential harm to human life.

1.4. The ability to recognize harm and threats to citizens is formed in the process of socialization and is reinforced during the study of the rule “Three C” (III-C) in each family and educational institutions:

do no harm to yourself (C1),

do not harm neighbors (C2),

do not harm the environment (C3),

neither in thought, nor in word, nor in deed;

to create for oneself, one's neighbors, and the environment with thought, word, and deed.  

1.5. Nravstvennost can be used by any person to determine their own system of values. Nravstvennoral values reach any person voluntarily due to their attractiveness and universality, and are supported by the participation of all citizens in nravstvennoral education and enlightenment.

 

2. Ensuring nravstvennorality

 

2.1. Nravstvennost is ensured by education, enlightenment, propaganda, state and municipal authorities, and the management of public and private organizations.

2.2. In order to foster nravstvennorality, nravstvennoral classes are held in educational institutions and other organizations.

2.3. During lessons and classes on nravstvennorality, citizens, guided by the nravstvennoral rule, acquire the ability to give public nravstvennoral assessments of events and actions that are committed by other subjects. The ability to recognize antinravstvennoral actions in one's own behavior, as well as in the behavior of other citizens and organizations, is a mandatory educational outcome of conducting a lesson on secular ethics.

2.4. The preparation and implementation of lessons and classes onnravstvennorality is provided by state and local authorities, public and private organizations, parents and persons replacing them.

2.5. Nravstvennoral education and nravstvennoral propaganda are organized in the mass media and with the help of information and communication resources. They are aimed at a visual presentation of the advantages of nravstvennoral behavior and ensure that each citizen is provided with examples of the onset of legal liability for antinravstvennorality, unethical behavior and lack of conscience.

 

3. Strengthening mutual trust between citizens and state and municipal authorities, economic entities

 

3.1. The behavior of a person guided by a nravstvennoral rule is nravstvennost.

3.2. Only nravstvennoral behavior that ensures the emergence of trust is ethical.

3.3. Trust – social relations that arise between citizens and civil organizations in the absence of mutual harm and threats. Without trust, the existence of civil society is impossible.

3.4. Society and the state interact on the basis of complete mutual trust, which arises as a result of the implementation of nravstvennoral behavior and management.

3.5. The common goal of the citizen, society and the state is mutual development and creation.

3.6. The formation of a nravstvennoral atmosphere in society and the state is ensured by the openness of social processes, procedures of public administration and local self-government, free discussion and ethical assessment of the behavior of social subjects, and is regulated by discursive and evaluative practices, broad discussion by society and the state of all important decisions and their results.

 

4. Ethical assessment

 

4.1. Ethical assessment is an assessment by citizens of the nravstvennorality of the actions (inactions) of other citizens and organizations of citizens from the standpoint of causing or not causing harm and threats in order to block antinravstvennoral behavior.

4.2. The process of ethical evaluation is open, regulated by citizens, society and the state, and is one of the forms of mutual trust between individuals, society and the state.

4.3. The basis for an ethical assessment is the commission by a citizen or organization of an act that is assessed by other persons as harmful or threatening to them.

4.4. A negative ethical assessment is an ethical burden on a social subject.

 

5. Civil consent and the scale of ethical assessment

 

5.1. Civil consent, positive (encouraging) or negative (condemning) is the opinion of citizens, expressed in an evaluative form regarding the social actions of social subjects.

5.2. Social action is the result of the activity of a social subject: intentions, statements, decisions, actions that affect interests, are capable of causing harm, creating a threat to more than one citizen.

5.3. A social subject is an individual, groups of people and their associations, organizations, enterprises, administration, government, civil society as a whole.

5.4. A social process is a way of existence of a social subject, its life activity carried out in interaction with other social subjects.

5.5. Negative civil consent is a consolidated condemning opinion of many social subjects regarding social actions or inactions of other social subjects. It is a tool for citizens, society and the state to protect and strengthen spiritual and nravstvennoral values, ensuring the priority of the spiritual over the material.

5.6. The ethical assessment scale (binary, multi-point) is a method of digitizing and visually representing the assessment of the level of nravstvennorality of a social subject. Ethical assessment scales can be used by citizens, organizations, and state and municipal authorities to organize the ethical assessment of social subjects.

 

6. Conscience and social justice

 

6.1. Conscience is an ethical regulator of human and citizen behavior, his internal attitude, formed in the process of nravstvennoral education with the help of other citizens and organizations that constantly correct the behavior and self-esteem of a person.

6.2. Conscience arises from ethical assessment, public discussion and condemnation of the behavior of a social subject.

6.3. Social justice is established and maintained by social actors acting in accordance with their conscience.

 

7. Legal liability for antinravstvennorality

 

7.1. Punishment and other legal measures applied to social entities who have committed antinravstvennoral, unethical and unscrupulous acts are permissible only to the extent that they are defined by current legislation.

7.2. The commission by a social subject of a social action that is ethically assessed by other subjects as antinravstvennoral leads to the formation of negative (condemnatory) civil consent.

7.3. Negative (condemnatory) civil consent in relation to a social subject leads to a loss of trust in it on the part of other social subjects.

7.4. Loss of trust leads to the destruction of the reputation of the social subject.

7.5. The lack of trust and reputation naturally hinders the implementation of the social subject's life activities. In this way, self-punishment is carried out for antinravstvennorality, unethical behavior and lack of conscience.

7.6. An official in respect of whom a negative civil consent has arisen is warned by the superior management about the threat of dismissal. In this way, the official is given the opportunity for nravstvennoral correction. In the event of continuation of antinravstvennoral actions, such person is subject to immediate dismissal from the position held due to loss of trust.

 

8. Global security

 

8.1. Global security is the state of protection of social subjects from threats and harm.

8.2. Global security is ensured by maintaining the nravstvennorality of social subjects and civil harmony.

8.3. Corruption, social stratification, poverty and destitution destroy nravstvennorality and create grounds for extremism, terrorism and other antinravstvennoral acts that violate public safety.

8.4. Combating corruption – actions of social subjects to prevent antinravstvennoral actions of other social subjects through consolidation and visual representation of negative civil consent in the ethical assessment of corrupt actions and manifestations of corruption.

8.5. The elimination of social stratification, poverty and destitution is ensured by nravstvennoral economic policy and the inviolability of private and personal property of citizens.

8.6. The antinravstvennoral socio-economic policy of the authorities leads to the loss of public trust and destroys civil harmony.

8.7. Rotation of personnel, including those who discredit the government by the fact of their presence in public positions, restores trust in the government, helps to minimize antinravstvennoral processes, and prevents lethal wars.

 

9. Social parasitism

 

9.1. Social parasitism is a way of existence of a social subject guided by the idea of personal gain at any cost. A consequence of the cult of money, double standards, and the discrepancy between words and deeds. The social parasite lives at the expense of other social subjects, without participating in their creative activity or imitating such participation.

9.2. A socially parasitic structure is an organization whose entire effort is aimed at obtaining funds to support its own existence. A characteristic feature of such a structure is the imitation of its main activity in solving social problems that are relevant to citizens.

9.3. Social parasitism is the cause of lethal wars, corruption, social stratification, extremism and terrorism.

9.4. Ways to prevent social parasitism – public control and ethical assessment of social subjects.

 

10. Sociopathy

 

10.1. Sociopathy (sociopathic disorder) is a mental illness characterized by a disturbance in a person’s thinking and behavior, leading to a systematic violation of social norms.

This mental pathology is characterized by the loss of conscience, nravstvennorality, and empathy for other people. Sociopaths do not respect the rights and feelings of others, manipulate them for their own benefit, and do not feel guilt or responsibility for their actions. The disease leads to serious problems in the personal, professional, and social relationships of people, organizations, states, and nations with whom sociopaths interact. Sociopaths constantly violate laws because they feel uncomfortable with any attempt by others to limit their arbitrariness. They have good social camouflage, using the mental modesty and social cowardice of citizens for their dominance in regulating the distribution of resources and benefits.

10.2. Diagnostic criteria for the condition of sociopaths, explained by the loss of conscience, nravstvennorality and empathy for others:

a) communication sphere defect: affectivity, excitability, loss of control over the desire for consumption, entertainment and dominance;

b) the chronic nature of an antinravstvennoral style of behavior, manifested in the desire to harm other people in order to maintain one’s own tyranny, dominance, unbridled consumption, entertainment, and social parasitism;

c) an antinravstvennoral style of behavior, disguised from others, manifests itself in the form of intrigues, conspiracies to cause harm and violate the laws and nravstvennorality of society, inciting mutual hatred and pitting people against each other in social situations;

d) the above-mentioned manifestations always arise in childhood or adolescence as induced states caused by imitation of specific sociopaths in the family, educational and professional environments;

d) sociopathic disorder results in significant harm to all individuals and organizations that encounter sociopaths;

e) the disorder is accompanied by a significant deterioration in the spiritual and material condition of persons who have entered into a relationship with a sociopath, deprofessionalization, and stupefaction of specialists; it is expressed in the imitation of professional activity, loss of a sense of duty and personal responsibility to society and the state.

To make a diagnosis, at least three criteria must be determined:

G1. An indication that the characteristic and constant types of internal experiences and behavior of the individual as a whole deviate significantly from the nravstvennoral norm specified by nravstvennoral rule III-C: the individual causes harm to others (-C2) and to the environment (-C3). Such a deviation must be manifested in more than one of the following areas:

1) in the cognitive sphere, there is a negative way of thinking about the people around and the environment, hatred of other people and fear of them, compensation for this fear through manipulation, seizure of power, resources, money, with the aim of depriving others of the opportunity to resist the tyranny of sociopaths;

2) in various situations (secret conspiracies, intrigues) negative emotions of sociopaths are manifested: anger, hatred, envy, irritation, remorse of greed towards others;

3) there is no control over drives and satisfaction of basic needs for food, consumption, entertainment, dominance; there are attempts to seize power in the personal and public spheres;

4) relationships with others and the manner of resolving interpersonal situations are of the nature of exploitation, humiliation, robbery and other forms of causing social harm.

G2. Deviations of this kind appear all the more symptomatic if they are sophisticated in nature and disguised as socially important goals and popular slogans that cannot be reduced to individual situations.

G3. They have an adverse effect on the social environment.

10.3. Personality disorder is characterized by a gross discrepancy between behavior and prevailing social norms. At the same time, it is characterized by the presence of general diagnostic criteria for personality disorder on a number of points:

a) loss of conscience, heartless indifference to the feelings of others;

b) a gross and persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social rules and responsibilities;

c) inability to maintain relationships in the absence of difficulties in their establishment, failure to comply with any agreements with people, organizations, society and the state;

d) extremely low ability to withstand frustration (a mental state caused by failure to satisfy needs), as well as a low threshold for the discharge of aggression, including violence;

d) inability to experience guilt and to benefit from life experience, including such forms of it as punishment;

e) a tendency to blame others for everything and everywhere and to put forward plausible explanations for one’s destructive behavior, leading to conflict with society, the state, and the laws (“everyone betrayed me,” “deceived me,” “set me up,” and other similar justifications);

g) the presence of constant irritability, bitterness, conflict;

c) disruption of behavioral norms in childhood and adolescence, subsequent difficulties in learning and superficiality of knowledge, lack of professional skills, compensated by verbosity with the use of unusual words and terms reflecting amateurism;

i) the sociopath's disregard for ethical norms and rules, usually explained by the fact that society and the state have allegedly caused him harm and now he is thus free to choose any means and methods to achieve his goals. In this case, the choice of means and methods is of a criminal, antinravstvennoral nature.

 

11. Technology of prevention of sociopathy

 

11.1. To prevent sociopathy, the technology of forming teams at all levels of state administration and public self-government is used. In the team, sociopathic manifestations are minimized.

11.2. A collective is a social group in which a nravstvennoral atmosphere has been formed, characterized by the following features:

internal unity of ideas, goals, objectives;

joint mode of activity;

mutual assistance and support for each other according to the principle of “one for all and all for one”;

self-government, where each member of the team plays the role of an executor when solving one problem, and a leader when solving another problem;

the opportunity for each member of the team to gain authority in the form of general recognition of social and professional suitability for the position or role held;

friendship, calmness and confidence in the future of each member of the collective;

constructive behavior of collective members, ensuring their mental and physical health;

a sense of pride in belonging to a friendship, calmness and confidence in the future of each member of the collective;

joint discussion and adoption of management decisions.

11.3. Collective (educational, labor, service, professional, managerial, business and others) are formed by the heads of state authorities and public self-government in all spheres of life of society and the state.

11.4. Regulation of collective relations is carried out in accordance with the principles of voluntariness, equality of rights and obligations, resolution of intra-collective issues through general discussion and assessment, joint decision-making, by mutual consent. The priority of nravstvennoral education and self-education of members of the collective, concern for their well-being and professional development, ensuring priority protection of the rights and interests of young and experienced members of the collective, veterans of labor and service are observed.

11.5. The collective has the right to discuss, evaluate and improve decisions aimed at fulfilling the tasks assigned to it. The rights of citizens in the team may be limited based on the decision of the head of the organization that formed the collective, only to the extent that this is necessary for the purpose of protecting the nravstvennorality, health, rights and legitimate interests of other teams and other citizens.

11.6. Prevention and suppression of the spread of destructive ideology is carried out in groups.

Signs of a destructive ideology:

selfish motives and aspirations;

priority of the material over the spiritual;

hedonism, parasitism andirresponsibility.

11.7. In educational, professional and management teams, measures are taken to develop in students, employees and managers the necessary socially important qualities for successful socialization and professional activity.

Socially important personal qualities, for the formation of which the heads of organizations with their teams and self-governing bodies of teams bear equal responsibility:

nravstvennoral thinking is a special attitude of thinking and behavior that allows one not to harm oneself, others, or the environment; it is formed with the help of other citizens and organizations that constantly correct a person’s behavior and self-esteem;

a sense of duty and personal responsibility for the task assigned;

family spirit – a sense of belonging to a strong family (a stable union between a man and a woman), pride in one’s family and ancestors, which is manifested in the ability not to harm one’s family members and to create for them, to preserve historical memory and the continuity of generations;

the priority of the spiritual over the material, expressed in the predominance of nravstvennoral ideas in regulating human behavior over material stimulation of this behavior;

conscience is a person’s ability to critically evaluate their actions, thoughts, desires, to recognize and experience their inconsistency with proper behavior;

justice is a human feeling that arises in response to the nravstvennoral behavior of other people, in which actions, thoughts and words are united and correspond to people’s ideas about proper and nravstvennoral behavior;

creative work is a human activity during which material and non-material goods are created for other people. It provides positive feedback when consuming the goods created;

honor – a person’s possession of a number of nravstvennoral and psychological qualities that are assessed by other people as qualities worthy of respect, forming the reputation of such a person; dishonor – the loss of such qualities, the destruction of a person’s reputation as a result of his antinravstvennoral actions;

healthy lifestyle, implementation of three provisions of the nravstvennoral rule of three C's:

do not harm yourself with thought, word, deed, and create for yourself with thought, word, deed;

do not harm other people with thought, word, deed, and create for other people with thought, word, deed;

do not harm the environment with thought, word, deed and create for the environment with thought, word, deed.

11.8. Persons holding leadership positions in the public authority system must have the following knowledge and skills to manage a collective:

personal example of nravstvennoral behavior and responsible attitude to the assigned task, priority of the spiritual over the material in the behavior of the leader;

the leader personally observes the nravstvennoral rule of the three Cs: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or your environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and your environment by thought, word, and deed;

in managing subordinates, uses the discursive-evaluative method: a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass assessment when discussing socially significant decisions;

the team selects supporters of the idea of a nravstvennoral path in order to be united and invincible;

all decisions are submitted for general discussion and evaluation;

all members of the collective participate in the discussion, evaluation, joint adoption, implementation and control of the implementation of the decision taken;

the team regularly sums up the results of the implementation of decisions made;

a general assessment is given to each member of the team and management who took part in the implementation of the previously adopted decision;

new tasks are set, supported by all members of the collective;

11.9. The training and education of personnel, as well as their professional use, are carried out within the team and through the collective.

11.10. Technology of formation and provision of team activities:

formulation, discussion and general assessment by team members of ideas, goals and objectives of joint activities (educational, professional, managerial);

acceptance by all of the ideas, goals and objectives of joint activities;

training in joint (collective) action to achieve intended goals and solve set tasks;

the practice of mutual assistance and support for each other based on the principle of “one for all and all for one”;

self-management: each member of the team is assigned several roles of leader and performer of various tasks;

regular general (collective) assessment of each member for his social and professional compliance with the social or professional position he occupies;

holding events aimed at establishing friendly relations between collective members;

care for each member of the collective, so that there is confidence in the nravstvennoral present and future;

constructive behavior of collective members, ensuring their mental and physical health;

rewarding and encouraging collective members to create a sense of pride in belonging to a given collective;

joint discussion, evaluation, adoption and implementation of educational, professional, and management decisions.

 

12. Ethics and rotation of management personnel

 

12.1. Management personnel are required to strictly adhere to nravstvennoral standards.

12.2. Citizens can continuously evaluate the social actions of management personnel. This process can be supplemented by public discourse of social actors and visual representation of the results of discursive practices.

12.3. Failure to comply with nravstvennoral standards, revealed during the ethical assessment of the actions of management personnel by citizens, should lead to the rotation of these managers.

12.4. Rotation of management personnel convicted of antinravstvennoral behavior unites society with state and municipal authorities, counteracts corruption, crime, extremism and terrorism, and prevents the emergence of lethal wars.

 

13. Ethical assessment as a procedure for preventing lethal wars

 

13.1. Ethical assessment is a state and civil procedure carried out by state authorities and citizens who have experienced harm from the activities of other citizens and organizations. Public ethical assessment is a generally accessible way of regulating social relations, implements the right of citizens to freedom of speech and nravstvennoral choice, and ensures the prevention of lethal wars.

13.2. A social subject may bring information about antinravstvennoral acts of other social subjects into the public sphere for open discussion. The social subject is responsible for the reliability of this information in accordance with current legislation.

13.3. Information about antinravstvennoral behavior of social subjects brought into the public sphere is subject to ethical assessment. All interested social subjects may participate in the process of ethical assessment.

13.4. For the ethical assessment of information made public, the entities that carried out the ethical assessment and/or organized it cannot be held liable in accordance with international law.

13.5. During the ethical assessment, a citizen expresses in any form, on written or electronic media, his assessment of the harm he has received from the individual or legal entity being assessed, or his opinion regarding the harm from a particular social action of any social subject.

13.6. Individuals and legal entities regulate their activities taking into account the ethical assessments of citizens. Taking into account a positive or negative ethical assessment is carried out independently in the form of taking appropriate measures to restore and maintain public trust and reputation.

 

14. Discursive practice as a state military and civil procedure for preventing lethal wars

 

14.1. Discursive practice as a state military and civil procedure for the prevention of lethal wars is the free participation of interested social subjects in the ethical assessment and discussion of socially significant actions of other social subjects.

14.2. Discursive practice may be carried out by government bodies and citizens in the form of forums, state, scientific, expert and public councils, open communication, and may also be reflected in the media and other information and communication resources.

14.3. The personal ethical assessment of any social subject can be changed only by him personally an unlimited number of times in the course of discursive practice.

14.4. Discourses are continuous in nature and ensure the education of nravstvennorality of social subjects, social justice and civil peace, form private norms regulating the behavior of social subjects, carry out the prevention of lethal wars and deprofessionalization (stupefaction, loss of intellectual superiority over the enemy) of military administrative, scientific and pedagogical personnel, specialists of the military-industrial complex.

14.5. Discursive practices are dynamic, subjective and cannot be the basis for holding social subjects participating in them liable in accordance with current legislation.

 

15. Nravstvennost Index

 

15.1. Nravstvennost index is a numerical indicator of harm from social actions or inactions of a subject. It is formed in the process of ethical evaluation.

15.2. Each social subject can have an individual nravstvennoral index.

15.3. The index of nravstvennorality is a dynamic characteristic of a social subject, changing in the course of discursive practices.

15.4. Information about the values of the nravstvennorality index of social subjects is open and accessible.

 

16. Ideology/technology of Nravstvennost

 

16.1. The ideology/technology of nravstvennorality is an eco-social technology and includes the idea of nravstvennorality as the idea of non-harm, freely accepted and shared by the majority of social subjects, and the associated procedure for measuring the nravstvennorality of social subjects.

16.2. The measurement of the nravstvennorality of social subjects is carried out in the process of ethical evaluation of their social actions. As a result, each social subject receives an individual index of nravstvennorality, constantly adjusted in the process of discursive practices.

16.3. Individual indices of nravstvennorality of social subjects are used by other social subjects in ensuring national security, state military construction, public administration, local self-government and in other types of life activities and defense of the country.

 

17. Discursive-evaluative method

 

17.1. The discursive-evaluative method (DEM) is based on the global ecological principle (GEP), which is understood as a way of human behavior that ensures the survival of humanity, based on the non-harm of a person to the environment, other people and himself.

The global ecological principle gives rise to the global ethical nravstvennoral principle (GEMP), according to which a person must behave in such a way as not to harm himself, others, and the environment.

17.2. The discursive-evaluative method consists of creating a special information and communication structure that allows for targeted online discourse and mass ethical assessment in real time, visually reflecting harm or threat emanating from a social subject. Such reflection allows for a positive influence on a social subject, preventing harm caused by it, and destroying the potential threat it poses.

17.3. The discursive-evaluative approach is the procedure for assessing the ethicality (nravstvennorality, ethics) of the behavior of specific social subjects. They are based on the discursive practices of the specific life activities of these social subjects. In the course of these procedures, discursive-evaluative regulators arise. They remind the subject how to behave in a particular social situation, provide subjects with the opportunity to explain why they act this way and not otherwise. And they give other subjects the opportunity to assess the social actions of subjects who are recommended to change their behavior in accordance with the global ecological principle.

 

18. Nravstvennost of management

 

18.1. Management is carried out for the protection and development of society. Prevention of management crises is based on the timely identification and rotation of sociopaths, psychopaths and mentally modest individuals from management bodies. Identification of these individuals is carried out by means of a mass assessment of the professional suitability of specialists and managers of all government bodies. This is the mental hygiene of state and private management, public self-government.

18.2. In order to implement nravstvennoral management, studies are conducted on the profiles of citizens’ life activities, from which indicators of professional and social compliance of behavior with the global ecology can be obtained: a person must not harm a person and the environment.

18.3. Research and clarification of the profiles of citizens' life activities are continuous. This ensures that changes introduced by the situation are taken into account with the aim of protecting and strengthening spiritual and nravstvennoral values, ensuring the priority of the spiritual over the material in the consciousness and behavior of a person.

18.4. The formation and strengthening of spiritual and nravstvennoral values that form the composition of socially important qualities of personality is carried out in the process of continuous training and education throughout the life of a person. Clarification of the dynamics of socially important qualities of personality, caused by changes in the situation, is immediately reflected in the content of training and education of citizens.  

18.5. The measurement of socially important qualities of an individual is carried out through expert and mass ethical assessment, as well as through discourse – open public discussion.

18.6. If selfish motives are revealed in the activities of a specialist in the state, military, civil or municipal service, the employment contract with such specialist is terminated early.

18.7. If the level of development of socially important personal qualities of a specialist is high, such a specialist is encouraged and appointed to a more responsible and managerial position.

18.8. Nravstvennoral management allows one to control the energy of the human masses, directing it towards creation.

 

19. Social-evaluative or discursive-evaluative networks

 

19.1. The construction of discursive-evaluative or social-evaluative networks is carried out on the basis of the discursive-evaluative method.

19.2. Discursive-evaluative or social-evaluative networks form the basis of eco-social technologies that visually reflect the process of group expert and mass ethical evaluation and discussion of the behavior of social subjects using various scales.

19.3. Real-time behavioral assessment allows for the education of a person and forms his or her ability to comply in his or her behavior with the requirements of the global ecological principle, the global ethical principle, and rule III-C.

19.4. Discursive-evaluative networks used by citizens, organizations, state and municipal authorities for self-government and organization of their activities ensure the movement of each person and all of humanity along the nravstvennoral path.

19.5. A citizen, organization, state or municipal authority that observes rule III-C in their behavior becomes a volunteer on the nravstvennoral path and gains nravstvennoral and intellectual superiority in a situation of lethal and non-lethal confrontation.

 

20. Rehabilitation of participants in lethal wars

 

20.1. The rehabilitation of participants in lethal wars is carried out by involving them in socially significant processes of state administration and local self-government, in economic activity and in the fight against social parasites, sociopaths and other perpetrators of inciting lethal wars.

20.2. State authorities, public organizations, and volunteers of the nravstvennoral path gather participants in lethal wars into study groups aimed at developing such a socially and professionally important quality as a sense of duty and personal responsibility for the assigned task. Illiteracy and the consequences of deprofessionalization in military affairs and civilian specialties are eliminated. New specialties in demand in society and the state are mastered. Further employment of participants in lethal wars is carried out, providing them with jobs with a high level of income and social security. The habit of socially useful work, creation for the benefit of society and the state is reinforced.

20.3. Participants in lethal wars maintain and strengthen their nravstvennoral attitude towards themselves and other people. They are involved in the process of identifying sociopaths and social parasites guilty of organizing a lethal war.

20.4. The identified perpetrators of the lethal war are brought up for public discussion and assessment, which facilitates the further prosecution and punishment of the criminals.

20.5. Public punishment of guilty persons, identified in the course of group expert and mass ethical assessment, blocks the destructive activity of other sociopaths to unleash another lethal war. The content of the punishment must comply with the established norms of international and national legislation.

20.6. The organizational and legal form of rehabilitation of victims of lethal wars is participation in the international movement of volunteers of the nravstvennoral path “Nravstvennoral Solidarity”.

 

21. Nravstvennoral solidarity

 

21.1. The international movement of volunteers of the nravstvennoral path "Nravstvennaia Solidarity" ("Nravstvennoral Solidarity") is an independent voluntary association of citizens and organizations whose goal is to create a nravstvennoral atmosphere on planet Earth.

“Nravstvennoral solidarity” must prevent the antinravstvennoral collusion of social parasites and their mutual guarantee against the impoverished and disenfranchised population.

The ideological and technological basis of “Nravstvennoral Solidarity” is the nravstvennoral rule C-III (do not harm yourself (C1), neighbors (C2), the environment (C3) with thought, word, deed; create for yourself, neighbors, the environment with thought, word, deed.

"Nravstvennoral Solidarity" carries out its activities on a voluntary basis and is an international civil form of unification of all inhabitants of planet Earth.

The “Nravstvennoral Solidarity” group includes all interested citizens, organizations, and movements.

21.2. Functions of “Nravstvennoral Solidarity”:

nravstvennoral international (Nravintern) of citizens of the whole world;

formation of a nravstvennoral atmosphere in society;

prevention of social parasitism and sabotage;

ensuring nravstvennoral solidarity among citizens of the entire world.

Creation and maintenance of publicly accessible functioning of discursive-evaluative social networks with a built-in ideology of nravstvennorality, the use of which allows each citizen to solve all their life issues, including in the field of medicine.

21.3. The coordinating organization for the activities of “Nravstvennoral Solidarity”:

Institute of Nravstvennoral Policy

address: https://is.ast.social

Contact address for cooperation:

Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.

 

22. Psychological and psychiatric support public administration and public self-government

 

22.1. In order to protect state authorities and public self-government from the penetration of sociopaths, psychopaths and mentally modest individuals capable of acting on the basis of hedonistic or parasitic motives, psychological and psychiatric support for state administration and public self-government is provided.

22.2. Psychological and psychiatric support for public administration and public self-government consists of training relevant specialists who will be subsequently involved in identifying and preventing sociopathy, psychopathies, and mental modesty in government bodies and public self-government.

22.3. When selecting personnel for government bodies and public self-government, candidates must undergo diagnostics for sociopathy, psychopathy, and mental modesty.

22.4. When civil servants, representatives of public and private organizations, and public figures carry out their professional activities, measures are taken annually to diagnose their deprofessionalization and sociopathization. Based on the results of such measures, a personnel decision is made to rotate persons whose psyche is destroyed by sociopathic and psychopathic manifestations and burdened with mental modesty.

22.5. Diagnostics of deprofessionalization is carried out by experts possessing the relevant professional knowledge. Subjects who have discovered the main sign of deprofessionalization – amateurism, are sent for advanced training or a decision is made on rotation of personnel who do not correspond to the professional or social positions they hold.

22.6. Identification and removal of sociopaths, psychopaths, and mentally modest individuals from government bodies and public self-government is the main condition for ensuring global security and protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens. This procedure is called the "social filter".

Without social filtering of state authorities and public self-government bodies, cleansing from sociopaths, psychopaths, mentally modest persons, no development and normal, healthy future is possible. Leaders should remember that the main source of harm to society is always sociopaths, psychopaths, and persons with mental modesty. The personal safety of each leader of a state authority (division) and public self-government body depends on their timely removal.

22.7. Preventing the penetration of sociopaths, psychopaths and mentally modest individuals into all socially significant positions in society and the state, international and private organizations is the main way to prevent a lethal war.

22.8. In regulating social relations, the states of the world community apply the basic provisions of the new ethics: a person should not harm a person, all socially significant decisions are widely discussed and implemented jointly with citizens.

22.9. Insults to individuals, humiliation of human dignity, aggressive statements and calls for murder of people are unacceptable in public places and information resources. Demonstration of harm to a person by a person is unethical, antinravstvennoral. States around the world help citizens to become nravstvennoral so that such citizens can protect their Fatherland from the main threat: sociopaths, psychopaths and ACGs (administrative criminal groups) created with their participation.

 

23. Longevity

 

23.1 By causing harm to others, a person causes harm to himself and shortens his life.

23.2. To strengthen personal and public nravstvennoral health, everyone can become a volunteer of the nravstvennoral path: not to harm other people and to create for them. It is this rule, if you personally accept it as the norm of your own life, that allows you to maintain health and prolong your life.

23.3. When a person stops harming other people, he ensures individual security, which is the basis of public security.

23.4. Each person, having accepted for himself the rule "not to harm other people", becomes a volunteer of the international movement "Nravstvennoi Solidarity". This movement unites all people on planet Earth who are guided by the nravstvennoral rule III-C in order to prolong their lives: not to harm oneself (C1), neighbors (C2), the environment (C3) neither by thought (M), nor by word (S), nor by deed (D); to create for oneself, neighbors, the environment by thought, word, deed:

 

C1 + C2 + C3

M + C + D

Where:

C1 – do not harm yourself and create for yourself;

C2 – do not harm your neighbors and create for your neighbors;

C3 – do not harm the environment, and create for the environment;

M – do no harm, and create with thought;

C – do no harm, and create with words;

D - do no harm, and create by deed.

23.5. The nravstvennoral path is a guarantee of longevity for everyone who has chosen this path for their life.

 

24. Nravstvennoral worldview and new ethics

 

24.1. The change of the worldview paradigm is caused by society's demand for peace, an end to bloody, lethal wars. Humanity is tired of antinravstvennorality.

For each person, freedom and justice are fundamental values. However, the old worldview, based on the utilitarian, monetary approach, still asserts the priority of material values over spiritual and nravstvennoral values. This means that a person values the material (money, property, power as admiration of one's own tyranny) above serving other people, who become only a tool for obtaining money, property, power. No one feels sorry for anyone, a person can be used and sacrificed, using the old view of the world (worldview) - divide and rule.

24.2. Based on this principle, various kinds of dividers (disjunctors) are generated on religious, ethnic, social and other grounds, based on which discord is incited, contradictions are aggravated. The result is a lethal, bloody confrontation.

Disjunction, logical OR, including OR; sometimes simply OR, is a logical operation that is as close in its application as possible to the conjunction "or" in the sense of "either this or that." It performs the function of separation.

24.3. The new worldview is based on spiritual and nravstvennoral values. It uses conjunction (unification).

Conjunction is a logical operation, the meaning of which is as close as possible to the union "and". Synonyms: logical "AND", logical unification. Conjunction performs the function of unification. Its use in social practice generates one universal connector - a new political principle "unite and create".

The basis of the nravstvennoral worldview is the category of “nravstvennorality”.

24.4. Institutionalization is the process of transforming any relations into institutions, that is, into a form of organizing relations with established rules, norms and their self-regulation.

The institutionalization of nravstvennorality is associated with the redefinition of this category through the global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm a person and the environment.

Nravstvennoral relations (relationships built on the well-known rule “Three Cs” (III-C): do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), the environment (C3) either by thought, word or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, the environment by thought, word, deed) through 20 years of efforts by scientists at the Institute of Nravstvennosti (https://in.ast.social) led to the beginning of the process of changing the worldview paradigm throughout the world. The Declaration of the Nravstvennoral Path of Humanity is supported by society in many countries of the world. It is based on the nravstvennoral rule III-C, the norms are set, supported, adjusted with the help of the discursive-evaluative method.

Self-regulation of social relations is also carried out through a discursive-evaluative path (method).

24.5. The advantage of this institution (social institution) is that each person can express their assessment and comment on a socially significant decision. Moreover, they can change their assessment and comment. Observing the discursive-evaluative process, choose for themselves the most harmless, that is, nravstvennoral attitude to the subject of discourse and evaluation. The instrument of self-regulation is the discursive-evaluative or social-evaluative networks of the new generation. An example of such a network has already been created - this is Globalnrav (Global Nravstvennorality, https://www.m.globalnrav.ast.social).

24.6. Social activists, ascetics, and volunteers of the nravstvennoral path can, using the discursive-evaluative method and new ethics (discursive-evaluative ethics built on the basis of the synthesis of the nravstvennoral rule III-C and the discursive-evaluative method), generate new social-evaluative or discursive-evaluative networks. Their totality will perform the function of a global ethical regulator of the behavior of socially significant subjects on whom the distribution of goods and resources, including financial ones, depends.

24.7. Social-evaluative networks with built-in discursive-evaluative ethics connect such categories as “freedom” and “justice” and balance them in the range of “nravstvennoral – antinravstvennoral”. Freedom and justice become dependent on the category of “nravstvennorality”.

Balancing is carried out by other people through public group or mass evaluation and discussion of the social subject. By means of behavior evaluation, the behavior of this subject is corrected.

After a nravstvennoral person leaves this world, the good memory of him continues to live and influence the behavior of others. Social life is quite possible after physical death if a person was discussed and evaluated by others as a spiritual and nravstvennoral person during his life.

Spirituality — is work for other people, in which a person gives them more than he takes in return. Work for the benefit of other people spiritualizes a person, becomes his spiritual foundation.

Nravstvennoral - this is a type of human behavior in which he does not harm himself or other people.

Thus, spiritual and   values are when a person does not harm and creates, and when creating, does not harm himself or other people.

This balance is provided by other people. The category "others" includes every person on planet Earth, is the basis for a new worldview - a nravstvennoral worldview.

24.8. Reformatting of the old worldview is ensured by eco-social technologies.

The new paradigm of human thinking is based on the practical application by each person of the nravstvennoral rule III-C: do no harm to oneself (C1), neighbors (C2), the environment (C3) either by thought, word, or deed; create for oneself, neighbors, the environment by thought, word, and deed.

The technological support for the new paradigm is provided by eco-social technologies and eco-pedagogy.

If citizens adhere to a single ethical standard - to do no harm and to create, then citizens will not harm the leaders of the state.

If you do no harm to others, you will be unharmed. Such a life path guarantees everyone health and longevity.

 The old paradigm of thinking, based on the priority of material values over spiritual and nravstvennoral ones, is becoming history. It is outdated, abundantly watered with the blood of millions of people. The principle of "divide and rule" has been replaced by "unite and create".

24.9. Organizational support for the promotion of the new paradigm of thinking to the masses is provided by the international movement “Nravstvennoi Solidarity”https://is.ast.social/menu-sotsialisticheskij-internatsional.html

Everyone can take part in this movement and contribute to ending deadly wars.

This movement in fact fulfills the function of a new international – a nravstvennoral international (Nravintern).

24.10. The pathological habit of ruling by division (divide and rule) has cost humanity dearly.

The new global humanitarian project of the nravstvennoral path of humanity eliminates all the shortcomings of the bipolarity, unipolarity and multipolarity of the world order.

24.11. The thesis "for everyone" is accepted by the world community. The process of globalization acquires a nravstvennoral coordinating principle. A nravstvennoral atmosphere is formed on planet Earth. Thus begins a new stage of human evolution without upheavals, catastrophes and lethal wars. Confrontation will not disappear, it will accompany humanity further. However, it will have a humane non-lethal character.

The new worldview is a view of the world through the “prism of nravstvennorality.”

The security of humanity is ensured by the nravstvennoral unity of man, society and the state. Human nravstvennorality is a necessary condition for the very existence of all humanity. This is the basis for evolution without upheavals and catastrophes and a new principle of local and global management "unite and create", built on the logical connection "I", "I".

Humanity leaves the destructive connection “OR”, “OR” in the dark past so as not to repeat it in its future.

 

25. Blocking ecosocial technology

 

25.1. In order for ecosocial technology to be humane, its application is correct not only for assessing the behavior of ordinary citizens, but also for reflecting the feedback of social connections to the subjects of management (leaders). It is this social group that is the object of public attention, and their decisions go through discursive-evaluative practices, which automatically improves them, makes them adequate to the demands of humanity for peace and well-being.

25.2. Blocking Ecosocial Technology (BEST) allows forbidding harmful actions of social subjects. It keeps a person, a separate group of people, humanity from a catastrophe associated with the activities of sociopaths and psychopaths.

25.3. BEST for each citizen:

personally take the nravstvennoral path, stop harming yourself, other people and the environment;

saw, felt harm - say "no" in thought, word, deed. Express disagreement with the tyranny of sociopaths. Ignore the information garbage and lies that sociopaths spread. Make your own assessments, and do not forward other people's thoughts;

discuss and evaluate sociopaths in discursive-evaluative networks. An example of such a network: Global Nravstvennorality GN (https://globalnrav.ast.social);

invite as many other citizens, specialists, and experts as possible to the discussion and evaluation; the onset of blocking the parasitic harmful activity of a sociopath who has become the object of a group expert and mass ethical evaluation depends on the number and quality of participants in the discussion and evaluation;

actively inform society by all means of communication about the results of the condemnation and evaluation of a particular sociopath.

Then a blocking effect called visualization of negative civil consent will kick in. All citizens agree that sociopaths are to blame for everything.

 

26. Informal justice

 

26.1. Informal justice is the process of establishing justice based on the discursive-evaluative method. Legal and judicial decisions are discussed at all stages and are assessed by experts and specialists from nravstvennoral and legal positions: do no harm, follow the spirit, not the letter of the law.

 

Fig. 1. Informal justice – the nravstvennoral balance of freedom and justice

 

26.2 In the battle for freedom and justice, only he who has achieved nravstvennoral superiority will win.

26.3. When providing legal assistance and protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens, it is necessary to take a nravstvennoral position and thus effectively protect the rights of victims of economic crimes.

The distinguishing feature of ACGs (administrative criminal groups) that commit economic crimes is their composition. It is formed by the leaders and other officials of public authorities. They enter into a mercenary conspiracy. They plan and commit economic crimes under the destructive influence of the ideology of money - the priority of the material over the spiritual. ACGs are the main subject of unleashing lethal wars and drawing peoples and states into a lethal confrontation.

26.4. Economic crimes undermine the foundations of the state’s defense capability.

The elimination of economic crimes is the basis of defense and security of society and the state.

The most effective fight against economic crime can be waged only by nravstvennoral citizens – true patriots of the Fatherland. An antinravstvennoral citizen will betray and sell out the Fatherland. It is antinravstvennoral individuals who commit economic crimes in order to weaken the country's defense and satisfy their own selfish interests.  

Adherents of the destructive ideology of money embark on the antinravstvennoral path of economic crimes.

26.5. Mechanism of economic crimes:

Sociopathy of man - loss of conscience and compassion for people, careless attitude towards public interests, pangs of greed and inadequate ambitions.

Antiravstvennoral worldview, the priority of material values over spiritual ones.

Willingness to enter into criminal conspiracies for the seizure and appropriation of material assets.

Failure to comply with the terms of the agreements, new conspiracies.

Betraying each other but based on motives of envy and greed, which contributes to the detection and investigation of economic crimes.

Model of the process of economic crimes: sociopathization – antinravstvennorality – priority of the material over the spiritual – collusion – seizure of material assets – arbitrary disposal of material assets – betrayal – punishment.

The use of this model of economic crimes allows us to create an adequate mechanism for protecting society and the state from this type of crime:

education of nravstvennoral citizens – true patriots of the Fatherland, who have developed a sense of priority between the spiritual and the material;

they openly discuss and decide everything, adhere to the global ecological principle (GEP - a person should not harm a person and the environment);

somatically and mentally healthy;

They do not participate in criminal conspiracies, they identify sociopaths and psychopaths and do not interact with them, they recommend that they get treatment and study.

26.6 Only an antinravstvennoral person commits crimes.

The education of a nravstvennoral person protects society and the state from crimes, the worst of which are economic crimes. The continuation of economic crimes is lethal wars.

26.7. The method of combating economic crimes is the education of nravstvennoral citizens and specialists of law enforcement agencies, the court and oversight.

26.8. Sociopaths and psychopaths, with the help of ACG, hold power over society and the state as long as people are mentally modest and socially cowardly. As a rule, sociopaths and psychopaths rob such a society, put it into a state of anomic depression, and people commit suicide, undermine their immunity, and die quickly. Sociopaths help them in this by sending people to wars for the redistribution of world resources. The death of people makes them wake up, realize that they died for resources that never belonged to them and never will.

Insight is the first step towards freedom and justice.

The second step is to personally embark on the nravstvennoral path: to create for yourself and others.

The third step is to carry out nravstvennoral education by personal example: members of your family, comrades at work, business partners, drawing attention to the fact that only nravstvennoral relations guarantee life and well-being for everyone. Deception, the race for profit, the cult of trade and ignoring social relations leads everyone to disaster.

The final step is to not listen to sociopaths and psychopaths:

don't listen to a sociopath or a psychopath: he lies and harms you;

Don't do what a sociopath and psychopath encourages you to do: he lies and harms you.

The criterion for recognizing a sociopath and a psychopath is the violation of a nravstvennoral rule: harming everyone and parasitizing on everyone, calling for the murder of a person, causing harm to other people, hiding behind the social disguise of “caring for the people,” “being chosen by God and the people,” and so on.

Any call to harm a person is a sign of a sociopath and a psychopath, the mark of a devil-man.

By ceasing to be a breeding ground for ACGs and sociopaths, each person, having made a nravstvennoral choice, will save himself, his family and all of humanity from the main threat - people without conscience and compassion, not normal antinravstvennoral persons.

The answer of a normal person to a sociopath and a psychopath is: treatment, treatment and more treatment!

Then study, study and study again, so as not to cause harm and to create.

 

27. Mental modesty and its prevention

 

27.1. Mental modesty (Cognitive disability) manifests itself in a person if he has not been instilled with the habit of reading and thinking, he has not mastered socially significant knowledge, he has not formed the skills and abilities relevant to socialization. At the same time, he can have a sufficient vocabulary, in everyday speech he does not reveal his intellectual defects. With superficial judgments, he imitates his literacy. It needs individual training and upbringing. When receiving such an education, he can overcome mental modesty and become a successful specialist and a competent leader.

27.2. Prevention of intellectual modesty is carried out by means of mass assessment of professional suitability of specialists and management personnel. Based on the results of the assessment, adequate personnel decisions are made on rotation or retraining of a person who is professionally unsuitable for the position held.

27.3. Mass assessment of professional suitability is a method of assessing a specialist's suitability for the position held, based on the assessment of citizens of a specific specialist by using a binary scale: suits the position held; does not suit the position held.

27.4. The binary assessment becomes correct in the case of a group assessment of a personality and a collective assessment of the personality of people who know each other from working together. Also correct is a mass assessment of a public figure, on whose activities the standard of living of citizens depends. If this standard is growing and they do not feel harm from the leader, then the assessment will be as follows: corresponds to the position held. If citizens feel a decrease in their standard of living, then their assessment will be as follows: "does not correspond to the position held".  

27.5. Rotation of specialists and managers based on the results of their mass assessment of professional suitability helps ensure the safety of society.

Recommended tools for public prevention of intellectual modesty:

Globalnrav

https://globalnrav.ast.social

 

Open Europe

https://euroopen.ast.social

 

CONCLUSION

 

New ethics and nravstvennoral worldview make it possible to establish a nravstvennoral atmosphere on planet Earth, to ensure peace, freedom and justice.

The job of each and every one is to create a nravstvennoral atmosphere on planet Earth!

Apply the DEM and the rule of three C's - they guarantee peace and progress. This is the great retainer, the katechon, the global eco-regulator of society.

The Nravstvennoi Path of Humanity is the path of peace and creation.

Every person, having embarked on The Nravstvennoi Path of Humanity, begins to keep himself, his immediate environment and the country from the catastrophe associated with the destructive activities of sociopaths, psychopaths and mentally modest individuals.

There are billions of us! We are nravstvennoi solidary and determined, the future belongs to nravstvennoral people. Victory will be ours!

General tasks of citizens, organizations, state and municipal authorities for the prevention of lethal wars:

change the metacultural code of man, move to a nravstvennoral culture through the use of new ethics associated with the global ecological principle: man does not harm man and the environment;

to carry out nravstvennoral education, which is understood as such an organization of training and upbringing that protects and strengthens spiritual and nravstvennoral values, thereby ensuring the priority of the spiritual over the material in the consciousness and behavior of a person.

Nravstvennoral education can be carried out by subjects who possess the necessary nravstvennoral qualities and experience in researching life and citizens. They must be able to organize educational and upbringing discursive-evaluative practices. We call such workers of nravstvennoral education subjectologists, specialists in obtaining, analyzing and taking into account in training, education and management data on attitudes towards a specific citizen, specialist, manager.

These problems are solved by maintaining nravstvennoral behavior in human relations and management with the help of eco-social technologies.

Ecosocial technologies (EST) is a set of techniques for applying the discursive-evaluative method when discussing and evaluating a specific socially significant decision with the participation of experts, specialists and the masses of citizens.

The discursive-evaluative method used in management and other activities allows each person to become a subject of their life activity, to create for other people and themselves; not to harm the environment, neighbors and themselves. Only in this way will our civilization become nravstvennoral, harmless to the environment and to every person on planet Earth. Lethal wars will be stopped. Man will stop killing man. The energy of struggle will move into the channel of non-lethal humane forms of confrontation.

 

ITO Hironori

Ph.D

Professor

Academician of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies

Head of the Japan Branch of the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies

Head of the Representative Office of the Institute for International Security and Informal Justice in Japan